PETRO HULU SDN. BHD. · CHEVRON MALAYSIA

FSUMV
marine services

Operating experience and application
to Chevron’s marine scope

THE SERVICE OPPORTUNITY

Crew change. Field supply.
Offtake support.

IPC operating experience → Application to Chevron
Petro Hulu · Discussion material · 9 September 2026 Crew change · Field supply · Offtake support

MEETING AGENDA

Agenda

From Chevron’s objectives to the operating evidence and the next evaluation.

Petro Hulu · Chevron Malaysia Supporting records are available within each topic.

01 / CHEVRON’S MARINE-SERVICE OBJECTIVES

Assess a combined service
against Chevron’s operating needs.

The programme brief brings crew change, supply and offtake support into one evaluation.

CREW CHANGE

Protect passenger movements

Plan the service around required crew-change windows and transfer arrangements.

FIELD SUPPLY

Serve the cargo programme

Match routes, cargo demand and field access with the vessel’s accepted working scope.

OFFTAKE SUPPORT

Define the handling duties

Confirm hose and hawser requirements, operating interfaces and retained specialist support.

2027Combined marine service

FSUMV introduction discussed in the client brief

2029Lower-fuel design objective

Use the operating duty profile to inform the future design

Focus of today’s review

What does the IPC experience establish, and what must be confirmed for Chevron?

Programme context: 15 June 2026 client brief; dated intentions, subject to confirmation. No award or approved build schedule is implied.

02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE

PH Leo at IPC’s Bertam field

A reference for crew change, field supply and hose-handling work.

CLIENT
IPC Malaysia B.V.
VESSEL
PH Leo
OPERATING ROUTE IN THE REPORTS
Kemaman ↔ Bertam

The evidence we will review

Crew and cargo: dated departure and arrival reports, with operating photographs.

Hose handling: the handling photograph, equipment roles and operating assessment.

Service delivery: IPC’s dated feedback and the requirements for an agreed service scope.

PH Leo · Crew-change voyage
Bertam–Kemaman · 9 September 2026
IPC provides the operating reference; Chevron’s nominated vessel and duties require their own acceptance. Activity window reviewed: 11 August–9 September 2026.

02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE

Recorded crew and cargo
activity at IPC.

PH Leo · Kemaman ↔ Bertam · 11 August–9 September 2026

Work recorded on those 20 legs

Five additional cargo legs report percentages and are excluded from the weight total.

Repeated use across different logistics tasks.

Four matched legs carried both passengers and cargo.

PH Leo · IPC supply voyage
2 September 2026 · 18:00 departure
A documented activity snapshot; not a utilisation or availability percentage.Two unmatched departures excluded from totals.

02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE

One operating day:
crew change followed by supply.

The practical value

Crew rotations and an evening cargo run share the same vessel in sequence.

This demonstrates scheduling in practice. It does not establish simultaneous capacity or a measured reduction in fleet cost.

All three days have matching reports for each of the three legs. Click a leg to inspect its departure and arrival.

03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE

Hose and hawser handling:
equipment, interfaces and operating scope.

01

Hose retrieval

IPC planning notes specify tugger winches for hose retrieval. The operating assessment describes hose-rope and towing-wire connections.

02

Hawser / mooring-line transfer

The assessment describes messenger-rope transfer between FPSO and tanker. Confirm the hauling winch and complete load path.

For Chevron’s nominated configuration

Agree equipment identity, rated pull, brake holding, witnessed tests and the accepted hose/hawser arrangement.

PH Leo · Floating-hose arrangement
IPC Bertam field
Winch ratings and duty acceptance require verification for the nominated vessel.Bollard pull is not a winch rating.

03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE

What IPC highlighted
about vessel and service quality.

The dated inspection does not establish whole-charter satisfaction, utilisation or a commercial saving.

03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE

Service assurance:
define the scope around the vessel.

Proposed planning framework for Chevron’s evaluation

01

Confirm the primary duties

Routes, crew and cargo demand, operating windows, transfer arrangements and offtake interfaces.

02

Plan for overlapping work

Agree priorities, specialist support and separate cover where duties cannot share the same vessel or window.

03

Set delivery responsibilities

Name the accepted assets, mobilisation arrangements, communications and decision owners.

FOS Gemini · Base load-out
Vessel operating reference
Coverage, readiness and response times are for agreement.No cover commitment is assumed.

04 / APPLICATION TO CHEVRON

Applying the IPC experience
to Chevron’s service windows.

Illustrative duty windows · a planning discussion, not Chevron’s actual schedule

MARINE LOGISTICS

Set the priorities

Crew windows, field access, offtake commitments and stop-work triggers.

OPERATIONS

Name the cover

Accepted asset, readiness, mobilisation time and escalation owner.

PROCUREMENT

Price the complete scope

Include retained and substitute vessels in the same comparison.

Separate cover resolves the illustrated scheduling conflict only. A nominated vessel still requires duty-specific acceptance.

04 / COMMERCIAL EVALUATION

Commercial evaluation:
compare the complete service.

Compare the complete service for the same work and operating windows.

ILLUSTRATION · COST INDEX, NOT CURRENCY

Test two different baselines

A dedicated crewboat and occasional crewboat hire create different economics.

Illustrative assumptions; no IPC rates, supplier quotation or measured saving.

Separate service
Combined service + cover

Hire for every vesselFuel for every assetMobilisation & supportRetained cover & other costs
A schedule and scope check comes before an economic claim. Actual comparable IPC costs remain unestablished.

05 / DISCUSSION & NEXT STEPS

Discussion and next steps

Proposed next step: define one Chevron operating scenario for joint evaluation.

MARINE LOGISTICS

A deliverable duty plan

Routes, volumes, service windows, offtake interfaces and the cover needed for overlapping work.

PROCUREMENT

A comparable service cost

Released and retained vessel days, all fuel and support, clear substitution obligations.

MANAGEMENT

A defined decision point

Review a nominated configuration, accepted scope and complete economics before deciding whether to proceed.

WHAT THE IPC REFERENCE ESTABLISHES

Recorded crew and cargo activity.
Practical scheduling examples for a combined service.

For agreement: scope, required inputs, counterparts and the next review deliverable. Discussion / Q&A

EVIDENCE AT THE POINT OF DISCUSSION

PINNED FEEDBACK

Add a comment

Your name and feedback will be visible to everyone reviewing this presentation.

SHARED REVIEW

Comments

SHARED REVIEW

Delete comment?