Protect passenger movements
Plan the service around required crew-change windows and transfer arrangements.
PETRO HULU SDN. BHD. · CHEVRON MALAYSIA
FSUMV
marine services
Operating experience and application
to Chevron’s marine scope
IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE
Offtake support
PH Leo
IPC Bertam
Offtake support
Petro Hulu · Discussion material · 9 September 2026 Crew change · Field supply · Offtake support
MEETING AGENDA
Agenda
From Chevron’s objectives to the operating evidence and the next evaluation.
Petro Hulu · Chevron Malaysia Supporting records are available within each topic.
01 / CHEVRON’S MARINE-SERVICE OBJECTIVES
Assess a combined service
against Chevron’s operating needs.
The programme brief brings crew change, supply and offtake support into one evaluation.
Serve the cargo programme
Match routes, cargo demand and field access with the vessel’s accepted working scope.
Define the handling duties
Confirm hose and hawser requirements, operating interfaces and retained specialist support.
2027Combined marine service
FSUMV introduction discussed in the client brief
2029Lower-fuel design objective
Use the operating duty profile to inform the future design
Focus of today’s review
What does the IPC experience establish, and what must be confirmed for Chevron?
Programme context: 15 June 2026 client brief; dated intentions, subject to confirmation. No award or approved build schedule is implied.
02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE
PH Leo at IPC’s Bertam field
A reference for crew change, field supply and hose-handling work.
- CLIENT
- IPC Malaysia B.V.
- VESSEL
- PH Leo
- OPERATING ROUTE IN THE REPORTS
- Kemaman ↔ Bertam
The evidence we will review
Crew and cargo: dated departure and arrival reports, with operating photographs.
Hose handling: operating experience, the investigation record and the subsequent risk assessment.
Service delivery: IPC’s dated feedback and the replacement-vessel chronology.
Bertam–Kemaman · 9 September 2026
IPC provides the operating reference; Chevron’s nominated vessel and duties require their own acceptance. Activity window reviewed: 11 August–9 September 2026.
02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE
Recorded crew and cargo
activity at IPC.
PH Leo · Kemaman ↔ Bertam · 11 August–9 September 2026
Work recorded on those 20 legs
Five additional cargo legs report percentages, not tonnes. They are included in the duty mix and excluded from the weight total.
WHAT THIS ESTABLISHES
A vessel used repeatedly for different logistics tasks, with four legs carrying both passengers and cargo.
A documented activity snapshot; not a utilisation or availability percentage. Two unmatched departures excluded from totals.
02 / IPC OPERATING EXPERIENCE
One operating day:
crew change followed by supply.
The practical value
Crew rotations and an evening cargo run share the same vessel in sequence.
This demonstrates scheduling in practice. It does not establish simultaneous capacity or a measured reduction in fleet cost.
All three days have matching reports for each of the three legs. Click a leg to inspect its departure and arrival.
03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE
Hose and hawser handling:
experience and equipment requirements.
Hose recovery
The 3 June investigation records the hose mooring line being connected to the tugger winch.
Hawser / mooring-line transfer
The September assessment describes messenger-rope transfer; the hauling winch is not identified.
Required before duty acceptance
Identified winch, rated pull, brake holding, witnessed test and the accepted hose/hawser arrangement.
IPC Bertam field
No certified winch rating or blanket offtake acceptance is asserted. Bollard pull is not a winch rating.
03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE
IPC feedback, operating lessons
and return to service.
IPC HSE INSPECTION · 31 MAY 2026
“the condition of PH Leo
is highly satisfactory”
Crew discipline, HSE practices, housekeeping and safety-equipment readiness were highlighted.
The same note raised connectivity and passenger-welfare suggestions. This inspection predates the June incident.
Hose-handling incident
Rope entanglement damaged the port-outer gearbox. No injury, pollution or hose damage was reported.
Return to IPC hire
Signed certificate records delivery at Kemaman, 09:00 local.
Training & revised controls
Training completion reported; the Master returned the revised hose assessment. Full action closeout still requires evidence.
The IPC quotation is a dated HSE assessment, not a whole-charter utilisation or commercial endorsement.
03 / OFFTAKE HANDLING & SERVICE ASSURANCE
Service continuity:
the June replacement arrangement.
Actual deployment record · 5–11 June 2026
5 JUN6 JUN7 JUN8 JUN9 JUN10 JUN11 JUN
From PH Leo off-hire to the first recorded replacement.
PH Prestij supported the crew movement while BW131 was deployed.
Agree cover, lead time and responsibility before combining the scope.
Elapsed deployment durations, not billed days or savings. This record does not demonstrate uninterrupted cover.
04 / APPLICATION TO CHEVRON
Applying the IPC experience
to Chevron’s service windows.
Illustrative duty windows · a planning discussion, not Chevron’s actual schedule
Set the priorities
Crew windows, field access, offtake commitments and stop-work triggers.
Name the cover
Accepted asset, readiness, mobilisation time and escalation owner.
Price the complete scope
Include retained and substitute vessels in the same comparison.
Separate cover resolves the illustrated scheduling conflict only. A nominated vessel still requires duty-specific acceptance.
04 / COMMERCIAL EVALUATION
Commercial evaluation:
compare the complete service.
Compare the complete service for the same work and operating windows.
ILLUSTRATION · COST INDEX, NOT CURRENCY
Test two different baselines
A dedicated crewboat and occasional crewboat hire create different economics.
Invented assumptions. No IPC rates, supplier quotation or measured saving is represented.
Separate service
Combined service + cover
Hire for every vesselFuel for every assetMobilisation & supportRetained cover & other costs
A schedule and scope check comes before an economic claim. Actual comparable IPC costs remain unestablished.
05 / DISCUSSION & NEXT STEPS
Discussion and next steps
Proposed next step: define one Chevron operating scenario for joint evaluation.
A deliverable duty plan
Routes, volumes, service windows, offtake interfaces and the cover needed for overlapping work.
A comparable service cost
Released and retained vessel days, all fuel and support, clear substitution obligations.
A defined decision point
Review a nominated configuration, accepted scope and complete economics before deciding whether to proceed.
WHAT THE IPC REFERENCE ESTABLISHES
Repeated multi-duty use. IPC’s dated feedback.
The real operating lesson and replacement response.
For agreement: scope, required inputs, counterparts and the next review deliverable. Discussion / Q&A